Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2015

reference
12-tree-1
name
2015
tree-preservation-order

undefined

12-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.984680 50.852741)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.984623 50.852735,-0.984626 50.852746,-0.984633 50.852756,-0.984646 50.852764,-0.984662 50.852769,-0.984679 50.852771,-0.984697 50.852769,-0.984713 50.852764,-0.984725 50.852757,-0.984734 50.852747,-0.984737 50.852735,-0.984734 50.852724,-0.984726 50.852714,-0.984714 50.852706,-0.984698 50.852701,-0.984681 50.852699,-0.984663 50.852701,-0.984647 50.852706,-0.984634 50.852713,-0.984626 50.852723,-0.984623 50.852735)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL